Practice Area · Court & Defense

Motions to Reopen & Reconsider

A motion to reopen asks an immigration judge or the Board of Immigration Appeals to revisit a closed case — often because of new facts, new evidence, or changed circumstances that were not previously available. A motion to reconsider asks the same body to correct an error of law or fact in its prior decision.

These motions are frequently used to challenge in-absentia removal orders (orders entered when someone missed a hearing), to present newly available evidence, or to seek relief based on changed country conditions.

Ahmad & Associates evaluates whether a motion to reopen or reconsider is available, obtains and reviews the underlying court and agency record, prepares the supporting evidence, and presents the legal basis for relief to the immigration judge or the Board. Strict deadlines and numerical limits usually apply, so prompt action is important.

These filings are technical and unforgiving. The motion has to be directed to the body that still has jurisdiction, filed within the applicable deadline or within a recognized exception to it, supported by evidence that satisfies the governing standard, and served correctly. A motion that is filed in the wrong forum, on the wrong theory, or without the necessary record is usually denied without reaching the merits — and the opportunity to file may not come again.

Just as important, filing a motion does not by itself pause enforcement. If removal may move forward while the motion is pending, a separate stay request often has to be prepared at the same time. The sections below explain how these motions differ, what the deadlines and exceptions look like, what records are typically required, and how we work through the analysis.

How It Works

When a motion may be available

Motions to reopen and reconsider are tightly regulated. Common situations include:

01 · In-absentia removal orders

Reopening may be possible if you missed a hearing due to lack of notice or exceptional circumstances.

02 · New, material evidence

Evidence that was not available and could not have been presented at the original hearing.

03 · Changed country conditions

Worsening conditions abroad that may support a renewed asylum or protection claim.

04 · Errors of law or fact

A motion to reconsider may correct a legal or factual mistake in the prior decision.

Key Points

The rules at a glance

Motions to reopen and reconsider are subject to time and number limits, with some exceptions:

  • Time limits — generally 90 days to reopen and 30 days to reconsider, with exceptions
  • Number limits — usually one motion to reopen, subject to exceptions
  • Exceptions for in-absentia orders, changed country conditions, and certain other grounds
  • Evidence must typically be new, material, and previously unavailable
The Difference

Reopening versus reconsidering

The two motions solve different problems, and filing the wrong one wastes a deadline that is often impossible to recover. In broad terms, a motion to reopen introduces facts the decision maker never saw, while a motion to reconsider argues that the decision maker got the law or the facts wrong using what was already in front of them.

Motion to reopen — new facts

Built on evidence that is new, material to the outcome, and was not available at the time of the earlier hearing. Typical examples include a newly approved family petition, a medical diagnosis, a marriage or birth that changes eligibility, evidence that the hearing notice never reached you, or country conditions that deteriorated after the case closed. The motion normally must show both that the evidence could not reasonably have been presented earlier and that it could change the result.

Motion to reconsider — legal or factual error

Built entirely on the existing record. It identifies where the decision misapplied a statute or regulation, overlooked controlling case law, relied on a fact the record does not support, or failed to address an argument that was properly raised. New evidence is generally not the basis for this motion; the argument is that the record, as it stood, required a different outcome.

Sometimes both, sometimes neither

Some cases support filing both motions, and some are better addressed through an appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals, a petition for review in the federal court of appeals, a new application filed with USCIS, or a request that ICE exercise prosecutorial discretion. Part of our review is deciding which procedural path actually fits the record rather than filing a motion for its own sake.

Deadlines

Timing, limits, and the exceptions that matter

Deadlines drive these cases. As a general rule, a motion to reopen is due within 90 days of the final administrative decision and a motion to reconsider within 30 days, and a party is usually limited to one motion of each type. Those rules are the starting point, not the whole picture — several recognized exceptions can extend or remove the time limit, and whether one applies depends closely on the facts and on current law in the relevant circuit.

  • In-absentia orders and defective notice — where a removal order was entered because a hearing was missed, a motion arguing that the required notice was never properly served may be filed without the ordinary time limit. Where the absence was caused by exceptional circumstances, a shorter deadline typically applies.
  • Exceptional circumstances — serious illness, a medical emergency, a death in the immediate family, detention, or comparable events beyond your control that prevented attendance. Documentation carries the argument here.
  • Changed country conditions — motions to reopen asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the Convention Against Torture based on material changes in the country of removal are generally not subject to the standard time and number limits, but they require substantial, well-sourced evidence of what changed and when.
  • Joint motions with DHS — where government counsel agrees to reopening, a joint or unopposed motion is typically not bound by the usual time and number restrictions. Agreement is discretionary and has to be negotiated.
  • Equitable tolling — some courts allow a late motion where a deadline was missed through no fault of the person filing, for example after ineffective assistance by a prior representative or a notario, and where the person acted diligently once the problem was discovered. Availability and requirements vary by circuit, and specific procedural steps are usually expected before the argument will be considered.
  • Sua sponte reopening — an immigration judge or the Board may reopen a case on its own authority in unusual situations. This is discretionary, used sparingly, and not something any applicant is entitled to.

Because these rules shift with new decisions and policy changes, an assessment of the deadline question should be made on your actual record and on the law that applies where your case was decided.

Important

Filing a motion does not automatically stop a removal

This is the point most often misunderstood. With limited exceptions, submitting a motion to reopen or reconsider does not by itself pause enforcement. Depending on the posture of the case, a separate request for a stay of removal may need to be filed with the immigration court, the Board of Immigration Appeals, ICE, or a federal court of appeals, and each has its own standard and its own supporting record.

If you or a family member is detained, has a scheduled check-in, has received a bag-and-baggage letter, or has been given a report date, the timing of a stay request is often more urgent than the motion itself. Tell us about any scheduled date at the first conversation so the sequence can be planned properly.

Building the Record

The records and evidence these motions usually require

A motion is only as strong as the record behind it. Old orders are rarely reopened on argument alone, so most of the work is reconstructing what happened and documenting what has changed. Depending on the case, that can include:

  • The prior decision and hearing record — the removal order, any written decision, hearing transcripts or recordings, and the immigration court file from EOIR.
  • Notices and proof of service — the Notice to Appear, every hearing notice, the address information in the file, and any returned or misdirected mail, which is central to a defective-notice argument.
  • Government records — your A-file and agency records obtained from USCIS, CBP, and ICE, and where relevant an FBI identity-history summary or state criminal records, including certified dispositions.
  • Prior counsel materials — the earlier representative's file, engagement documents, and correspondence, which matter when ineffective assistance is part of the argument.
  • Eligibility documents — approved or pending petitions, receipt and approval notices, marriage and birth certificates, and evidence of continuous presence or qualifying relationships.
  • Hardship and equity evidence — medical and psychological records, school records, treatment plans, financial documentation, and letters from employers, clergy, and community members.
  • Country-conditions evidence — State Department and international organization reporting, credible news coverage, and where appropriate a country-conditions or medical expert declaration.
  • Sworn statements — your own detailed declaration plus affidavits from witnesses who can corroborate the timeline, with certified translations where required.

Some of these records take weeks or months to obtain, which is another reason to begin as early as possible rather than waiting for the deadline to approach.

Next Steps

How we approach a possible motion

01 · Fix the timeline

We establish exactly what was decided, by whom, and when, and identify any upcoming check-in, report date, or enforcement deadline. That determines how much time is actually available.

02 · Obtain the file

We request the immigration court record and the relevant agency files so the motion is written against the real record rather than a reconstruction from memory.

03 · Assess the theory

We evaluate whether reopening, reconsideration, an appeal, a new filing, or a discretionary request is the better route, and whether an exception to the time limit is genuinely supportable.

04 · Address enforcement risk

Where removal may proceed, we consider whether a stay request should be filed and where, and in what order relative to the motion.

05 · Prepare and file

We assemble the supporting evidence, declarations, and legal argument, serve the required parties, and file with the body that has jurisdiction over the case.

06 · Plan for the outcome

If the motion is granted, the case returns to an active posture and we prepare the underlying relief. If it is denied, we review appellate or federal-court options and any remaining alternatives.

Please note: This page is general legal information about a complex area of immigration practice and is not legal advice about your case. Outcomes depend on the specific record, the applicable law, and the discretion of the deciding authority, and no result can be promised. Reviewing whether a motion is available does not create an attorney-client relationship; that begins only with a signed engagement.

Questions

Frequently asked questions

Get Started

Ready to discuss your immigration matter?

Schedule a confidential consultation with Ahmad & Associates. We assist clients throughout Virginia, Maryland, the District of Columbia, and Pennsylvania, and represent clients nationwide before federal immigration courts. Multilingual assistance is available.

8000 Westpark Drive, Suite 630, McLean, VA 22102